<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 767 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112597</link>
    <description>The court approved the Scheme of Arrangement between Reliance Communications Ltd. and Reliance Infratel Ltd. under section 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found compliance with legal requirements, transparency in asset valuation, minimal impact on shareholders and creditors, adherence to accounting standards, and procedural fairness in meetings. Modifications were made regarding the interest rate on deferred consideration. The court rejected public interest objections and awarded costs to the Regional Director. The Scheme was approved with specified conditions, and parties were directed to act accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 767 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112597</link>
      <description>The court approved the Scheme of Arrangement between Reliance Communications Ltd. and Reliance Infratel Ltd. under section 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found compliance with legal requirements, transparency in asset valuation, minimal impact on shareholders and creditors, adherence to accounting standards, and procedural fairness in meetings. Modifications were made regarding the interest rate on deferred consideration. The court rejected public interest objections and awarded costs to the Regional Director. The Scheme was approved with specified conditions, and parties were directed to act accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>