<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 760 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112583</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Official Liquidator&#039;s application, finding no substantial evidence of misfeasance or breach of trust by the ex-directors. The judgment emphasized the necessity of specific and detailed allegations to establish liability under Sections 542 and 543 of the Companies Act, 1956, highlighting the insufficiency of general allegations without specific instances of misconduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 760 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112583</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Official Liquidator&#039;s application, finding no substantial evidence of misfeasance or breach of trust by the ex-directors. The judgment emphasized the necessity of specific and detailed allegations to establish liability under Sections 542 and 543 of the Companies Act, 1956, highlighting the insufficiency of general allegations without specific instances of misconduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>