<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 461 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112567</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and ruled in favor of the Revenue, demanding duty under Section 4 instead of Section 4A for goods assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of its previous decision on the respondents, rendering conflicting judgments irrelevant. The appeal outcome favored the Revenue, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and restoring the original duty assessment under Section 4.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:29:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 461 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112567</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and ruled in favor of the Revenue, demanding duty under Section 4 instead of Section 4A for goods assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of its previous decision on the respondents, rendering conflicting judgments irrelevant. The appeal outcome favored the Revenue, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and restoring the original duty assessment under Section 4.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>