https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112566 The court condoned a 342-day delay in filing the appeal, vacating an interim order in favor of the appellant. The challenge to the impugned order by the Company Law Board was dismissed, upholding the validity of the resolution removing the appellant from directorship passed in the AGM. The court affirmed the Board's exercise of discretionary power and found legal notice requirements for the AGM were met. The interpretation of Companies Act provisions supported the validity of the AGM's resolution, emphasizing statutory compliance and proper notice service. en-us Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Nov 2014 13:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112566 The court condoned a 342-day delay in filing the appeal, vacating an interim order in favor of the appellant. The challenge to the impugned order by the Company Law Board was dismissed, upholding the validity of the resolution removing the appellant from directorship passed in the AGM. The court affirmed the Board's exercise of discretionary power and found legal notice requirements for the AGM were met. The interpretation of Companies Act provisions supported the validity of the AGM's resolution, emphasizing statutory compliance and proper notice service. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112566