https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112556 A company-law challenge raised maintainability objections because no substantial question of law was framed and the appellant was not the directly aggrieved party. The court treated those objections as significant and found no basis to interfere. On the merits, it upheld the finding that the resignation letter, share transfer form and related documents were not proved to be genuine after comparison with admitted signatures, and held that the absence of valid transfer and valid resignation justified rectification of the register of members and restoration of directorship as consequential relief under the Companies Act, 1956. en-us Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112556 A company-law challenge raised maintainability objections because no substantial question of law was framed and the appellant was not the directly aggrieved party. The court treated those objections as significant and found no basis to interfere. On the merits, it upheld the finding that the resignation letter, share transfer form and related documents were not proved to be genuine after comparison with admitted signatures, and held that the absence of valid transfer and valid resignation justified rectification of the register of members and restoration of directorship as consequential relief under the Companies Act, 1956. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112556