https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112542 The High Court held that the Central Government lost jurisdiction to direct the petitioner to change its name under Section 22 of the Companies Act due to the lapse of the 12-month period. The court quashed the order, allowing the writ petition with each party bearing its costs. en-us Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Nov 2014 14:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112542 The High Court held that the Central Government lost jurisdiction to direct the petitioner to change its name under Section 22 of the Companies Act due to the lapse of the 12-month period. The court quashed the order, allowing the writ petition with each party bearing its costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112542