<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 447 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112473</link>
    <description>A broadly worded power of attorney authorising a representative to file and contest cases in Indian courts was sufficient to institute a winding-up petition, because such proceedings are a legal remedy connected with debt recovery and not confined to ordinary civil suits. On the merits, repeated admissions of liability, requests for instalments, and assertions of financial crunch showed inability to pay admitted debts; reported profits did not displace that conclusion where the debt remained unpaid after notice. The winding-up jurisdiction was therefore properly invoked, and the company was liable to be wound up.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 447 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112473</link>
      <description>A broadly worded power of attorney authorising a representative to file and contest cases in Indian courts was sufficient to institute a winding-up petition, because such proceedings are a legal remedy connected with debt recovery and not confined to ordinary civil suits. On the merits, repeated admissions of liability, requests for instalments, and assertions of financial crunch showed inability to pay admitted debts; reported profits did not displace that conclusion where the debt remained unpaid after notice. The winding-up jurisdiction was therefore properly invoked, and the company was liable to be wound up.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>