<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 452 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112468</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order, determining that the assessable value should not be calculated based on the MRP affixed on finished goods. As the goods were not covered by Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, duty was not required to be paid on the MRP basis. The duty liability was correctly discharged under Section 4 of the Act, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:12:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 452 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112468</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order, determining that the assessable value should not be calculated based on the MRP affixed on finished goods. As the goods were not covered by Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, duty was not required to be paid on the MRP basis. The duty liability was correctly discharged under Section 4 of the Act, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>