https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112462 The Tribunal granted the extension of stay of recovery in a case where attachment proceedings under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 were found to violate principles of natural justice. The Tribunal noted that the attachment order included items immune to attachment without allowing the party to show cause, contrary to principles of natural justice. The extension was granted to prevent injustice and ensure the ends of justice were served, following the precedent set in IPCL v. CCE decision. en-us Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:48:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112462 The Tribunal granted the extension of stay of recovery in a case where attachment proceedings under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 were found to violate principles of natural justice. The Tribunal noted that the attachment order included items immune to attachment without allowing the party to show cause, contrary to principles of natural justice. The extension was granted to prevent injustice and ensure the ends of justice were served, following the precedent set in IPCL v. CCE decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112462