https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112457 The court allowed the petitions, setting aside the conviction and sentence in the case. It emphasized the acceptance of resignation by the Registrar of Companies in 1971 and the lack of objections raised over the years. The court found the complaints filed in 1993 to be time-barred and lacking grounds, as the alleged violations occurred post-resignation without objection. Precedent cases supported the unilateral resignation of a director without filing specific forms. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, dismissing the complaints initiated long after the resignation was communicated and accepted. en-us Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112457 The court allowed the petitions, setting aside the conviction and sentence in the case. It emphasized the acceptance of resignation by the Registrar of Companies in 1971 and the lack of objections raised over the years. The court found the complaints filed in 1993 to be time-barred and lacking grounds, as the alleged violations occurred post-resignation without objection. Precedent cases supported the unilateral resignation of a director without filing specific forms. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, dismissing the complaints initiated long after the resignation was communicated and accepted. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112457