<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 439 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112451</link>
    <description>The court ordered the company to deposit a specified amount based on the filing of a suit, with conditions for investment and transfer outlined. The judgment stated that if the Petitioner&#039;s case on merits was valid and the company&#039;s defence was not accepted, the letter and Annexure-I would constitute an acknowledgement of liability under the Limitation Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 439 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112451</link>
      <description>The court ordered the company to deposit a specified amount based on the filing of a suit, with conditions for investment and transfer outlined. The judgment stated that if the Petitioner&#039;s case on merits was valid and the company&#039;s defence was not accepted, the letter and Annexure-I would constitute an acknowledgement of liability under the Limitation Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>