<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 435 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application for condonation of delay and rectification of mistake, emphasizing adherence to statutory time limits and the necessity of providing valid reasons for delays in legal proceedings. The application was found to be time-barred under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act, with insufficient reasons provided for condonation of the delay, leading to the dismissal of the rectification application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:54:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 435 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application for condonation of delay and rectification of mistake, emphasizing adherence to statutory time limits and the necessity of providing valid reasons for delays in legal proceedings. The application was found to be time-barred under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act, with insufficient reasons provided for condonation of the delay, leading to the dismissal of the rectification application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>