<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 336 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112404</link>
    <description>Where company-law proceedings before the Company Law Board are challenged, the appellate forum is governed by the Companies Act, 1956, not by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 merely because an ancillary section 45 arbitration request was made. The Delhi High Court&#039;s analysis states that the character of the proceedings remains company-law based, so the special appellate route under section 10(1)(a) and section 10F of the Companies Act continues to apply. On that footing, the appeal was held not maintainable before the Delhi High Court, and territorial jurisdiction lay with the High Court having jurisdiction over the company&#039;s registered office.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 12:02:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 336 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112404</link>
      <description>Where company-law proceedings before the Company Law Board are challenged, the appellate forum is governed by the Companies Act, 1956, not by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 merely because an ancillary section 45 arbitration request was made. The Delhi High Court&#039;s analysis states that the character of the proceedings remains company-law based, so the special appellate route under section 10(1)(a) and section 10F of the Companies Act continues to apply. On that footing, the appeal was held not maintainable before the Delhi High Court, and territorial jurisdiction lay with the High Court having jurisdiction over the company&#039;s registered office.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>