https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112400 The court refrained from determining jurisdiction and maintainability issues regarding a company petition for scheme approval, deferring them for future proceedings. It clarified that convening meetings did not imply scheme approval. Emphasizing that objections should be raised at the appropriate stage, the court highlighted that its order facilitated input but did not approve the scheme. The court disposed of the application without delving into the case's merits, leaving all questions open for future consideration and reiterating that objections could be raised during the petition's admission stage. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:29:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112400 The court refrained from determining jurisdiction and maintainability issues regarding a company petition for scheme approval, deferring them for future proceedings. It clarified that convening meetings did not imply scheme approval. Emphasizing that objections should be raised at the appropriate stage, the court highlighted that its order facilitated input but did not approve the scheme. The court disposed of the application without delving into the case's merits, leaving all questions open for future consideration and reiterating that objections could be raised during the petition's admission stage. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112400