<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 247 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112397</link>
    <description>The court found that the Company Law Board&#039;s order was not perverse and was supported by evidence. It concluded that the conditions under section 237(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 were met, justifying an investigation into the questionable transactions. As a result, the appeal challenging the maintainability of the appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was directed to pay costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:17:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 247 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112397</link>
      <description>The court found that the Company Law Board&#039;s order was not perverse and was supported by evidence. It concluded that the conditions under section 237(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 were met, justifying an investigation into the questionable transactions. As a result, the appeal challenging the maintainability of the appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was directed to pay costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>