<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 244 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112390</link>
    <description>The applications challenging the Bombay Stock Exchange&#039;s refusal to list the shares of Mayajaal Entertainment Ltd. were dismissed. The Court upheld the Exchange&#039;s regulatory authority, emphasizing compliance with securities laws and Stock Exchange bye-laws. The Court noted that while the Scheme of Amalgamation was approved, it does not override the Exchange&#039;s authority. The applicants were directed to pursue an appeal with the Securities Appellate Tribunal. The Scheme&#039;s clause regarding listing remains unenforceable pending the appeal&#039;s outcome, underscoring the necessity for adherence to the Listing Agreement and securities regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 244 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112390</link>
      <description>The applications challenging the Bombay Stock Exchange&#039;s refusal to list the shares of Mayajaal Entertainment Ltd. were dismissed. The Court upheld the Exchange&#039;s regulatory authority, emphasizing compliance with securities laws and Stock Exchange bye-laws. The Court noted that while the Scheme of Amalgamation was approved, it does not override the Exchange&#039;s authority. The applicants were directed to pursue an appeal with the Securities Appellate Tribunal. The Scheme&#039;s clause regarding listing remains unenforceable pending the appeal&#039;s outcome, underscoring the necessity for adherence to the Listing Agreement and securities regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>