<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 464 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112378</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore denied the appellants&#039; request for an early hearing of appeals related to a duty amount of Rs. 9.4 lakhs. The tribunal ruled that the risk of confiscated goods deteriorating did not warrant expedited proceedings. The appellants were directed to clear the goods by paying a redemption fine of Rs. 1 lakh and a penalty of Rs. 25,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:40:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 464 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112378</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore denied the appellants&#039; request for an early hearing of appeals related to a duty amount of Rs. 9.4 lakhs. The tribunal ruled that the risk of confiscated goods deteriorating did not warrant expedited proceedings. The appellants were directed to clear the goods by paying a redemption fine of Rs. 1 lakh and a penalty of Rs. 25,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>