https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112345 Relief under section 633(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 depends on a factual assessment of whether the company officer acted honestly and reasonably and whether any liability arose only from negligence, default, breach of duty, misfeasance, or breach of trust. Because that inquiry requires evidence and examination by the trial court, a petition to quash the criminal proceedings was treated as premature. The proper course was for the petitioner to seek appropriate relief before the trial court at the relevant stage, rather than obtain quashing at the threshold. en-us Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:58:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112345 Relief under section 633(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 depends on a factual assessment of whether the company officer acted honestly and reasonably and whether any liability arose only from negligence, default, breach of duty, misfeasance, or breach of trust. Because that inquiry requires evidence and examination by the trial court, a petition to quash the criminal proceedings was treated as premature. The proper course was for the petitioner to seek appropriate relief before the trial court at the relevant stage, rather than obtain quashing at the threshold. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112345