<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 424 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112325</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the reduction of penalty imposed by the appellate authority on the appellants for not having permission from RBI, despite their claim of no default. The penalty was reduced based on the discretion of the appellate authority, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:18:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 424 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112325</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the reduction of penalty imposed by the appellate authority on the appellants for not having permission from RBI, despite their claim of no default. The penalty was reduced based on the discretion of the appellate authority, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>