<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 423 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112323</link>
    <description>Where revisional power under the Foreign Exchange Management Act is conferred without a prescribed limitation period, the application must still be brought within a reasonable time judged on the facts. A delay of 4 years and 5 months was treated as beyond a reasonable period, so the Tribunal was justified in declining to entertain the revision. The appeal therefore failed, and the framed question of law did not survive for adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:16:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 423 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112323</link>
      <description>Where revisional power under the Foreign Exchange Management Act is conferred without a prescribed limitation period, the application must still be brought within a reasonable time judged on the facts. A delay of 4 years and 5 months was treated as beyond a reasonable period, so the Tribunal was justified in declining to entertain the revision. The appeal therefore failed, and the framed question of law did not survive for adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>