<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 444 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of imported C.T. Scan Machine and spare parts, as well as the imposition of penalties on M/s. C.T. Scan Research Centre (P) Ltd. for non-compliance with Notification No. 64/88-Cus. The Appellants failed to meet the notification&#039;s conditions, including providing free treatment to patients. The judgment stressed the ongoing obligation to fulfill notification requirements, even after repeal, and the repercussions of non-compliance under the Customs Act. The penalty amount was deemed reasonable, and the fine was reduced in consideration of circumstances, as per legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:07:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 444 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of imported C.T. Scan Machine and spare parts, as well as the imposition of penalties on M/s. C.T. Scan Research Centre (P) Ltd. for non-compliance with Notification No. 64/88-Cus. The Appellants failed to meet the notification&#039;s conditions, including providing free treatment to patients. The judgment stressed the ongoing obligation to fulfill notification requirements, even after repeal, and the repercussions of non-compliance under the Customs Act. The penalty amount was deemed reasonable, and the fine was reduced in consideration of circumstances, as per legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>