https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112313 The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the legality of the respondent's actions in filing the Company Application, the property's sale and transfer, and the validity of the lease deed. It found the Official Liquidator's sealing of the property in 1996 improper and affirmed the finality of the property sale, concluding that the Company Judge's decisions were lawful and valid. The Court rejected challenges to the property actions under the UP Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972, and suggested alternative legal avenues for the appellant. en-us Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Dec 2014 21:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112313 The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the legality of the respondent's actions in filing the Company Application, the property's sale and transfer, and the validity of the lease deed. It found the Official Liquidator's sealing of the property in 1996 improper and affirmed the finality of the property sale, concluding that the Company Judge's decisions were lawful and valid. The Court rejected challenges to the property actions under the UP Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972, and suggested alternative legal avenues for the appellant. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112313