<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 435 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112303</link>
    <description>The manufacturer, involved in a case concerning duty evasion and valuation disputes, had their appeal partly allowed. The duty demand was reduced to Rs. 12,87,395/-, and the penalty was decreased to Rs. 10 lakhs. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturer on issues related to sound delivery charges and charges for certain services in the assessable value. However, duty demands for specific goods and penalties related to clandestine removal were upheld. Individual penalties on the officers were not justified. Interest was payable on the revised duty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:40:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 435 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112303</link>
      <description>The manufacturer, involved in a case concerning duty evasion and valuation disputes, had their appeal partly allowed. The duty demand was reduced to Rs. 12,87,395/-, and the penalty was decreased to Rs. 10 lakhs. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturer on issues related to sound delivery charges and charges for certain services in the assessable value. However, duty demands for specific goods and penalties related to clandestine removal were upheld. Individual penalties on the officers were not justified. Interest was payable on the revised duty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>