<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 413 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112302</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s interim order directing the implementation of resolutions for the removal of existing directors pending the main petition&#039;s disposal. It found the extraordinary general meeting (EGM) valid, supporting the resolutions passed by the majority shareholders. Allegations of oppression and mismanagement were to be addressed in the main petition. The court allowed the continuation of the Commissioner appointed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal and emphasized compliance with procedural requirements under the Companies Act. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the CLB&#039;s order and emphasizing corporate democracy and judicial discretion in granting interim relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 09:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 413 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112302</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s interim order directing the implementation of resolutions for the removal of existing directors pending the main petition&#039;s disposal. It found the extraordinary general meeting (EGM) valid, supporting the resolutions passed by the majority shareholders. Allegations of oppression and mismanagement were to be addressed in the main petition. The court allowed the continuation of the Commissioner appointed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal and emphasized compliance with procedural requirements under the Companies Act. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the CLB&#039;s order and emphasizing corporate democracy and judicial discretion in granting interim relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>