<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 411 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112293</link>
    <description>Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 is to be construed strictly and protects proceedings only where they directly affect a sick industrial company&#039;s assets, contractual liabilities, or implementation of a revival scheme. A tort claim for defamation stands on a different footing from recovery of contractual dues or enforcement of security. Damages sought for defamation are compensatory in nature and do not amount to a proceeding for recovery of money within the statutory suspension. Accordingly, a civil suit for defamation damages against a sick industrial company is not barred by section 22, and suspension of the proceedings is unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 411 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112293</link>
      <description>Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 is to be construed strictly and protects proceedings only where they directly affect a sick industrial company&#039;s assets, contractual liabilities, or implementation of a revival scheme. A tort claim for defamation stands on a different footing from recovery of contractual dues or enforcement of security. Damages sought for defamation are compensatory in nature and do not amount to a proceeding for recovery of money within the statutory suspension. Accordingly, a civil suit for defamation damages against a sick industrial company is not barred by section 22, and suspension of the proceedings is unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>