<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 410 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112292</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the respondent, finding that the complaint related to a balance-sheet from 1981 and the legal amendment in 1988 was not retrospective. As a result, the petition was allowed, the complaint was quashed, and no costs were imposed. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the legal provisions regarding the transfer of unpaid dividends to special accounts under section 205A of the Companies Act, 1956.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 410 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112292</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the respondent, finding that the complaint related to a balance-sheet from 1981 and the legal amendment in 1988 was not retrospective. As a result, the petition was allowed, the complaint was quashed, and no costs were imposed. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the legal provisions regarding the transfer of unpaid dividends to special accounts under section 205A of the Companies Act, 1956.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>