<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 540 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112268</link>
    <description>Bleach liquor used captively in paper manufacture was held not to be excisable because marketability was not proved. Excise duty applies only to goods capable of being bought and sold in the market and known to the market; mere inclusion in the tariff or an HSN description is insufficient. On the facts, the liquor was prepared fresh in a continuous process, had a very short shelf life, remained unstable, and could not be marketed. The Revenue produced no technical or chemical evidence to rebut that finding. As the foundational requirement of excisability failed, captive consumption did not create liability to Central Excise duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:32:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 540 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112268</link>
      <description>Bleach liquor used captively in paper manufacture was held not to be excisable because marketability was not proved. Excise duty applies only to goods capable of being bought and sold in the market and known to the market; mere inclusion in the tariff or an HSN description is insufficient. On the facts, the liquor was prepared fresh in a continuous process, had a very short shelf life, remained unstable, and could not be marketed. The Revenue produced no technical or chemical evidence to rebut that finding. As the foundational requirement of excisability failed, captive consumption did not create liability to Central Excise duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>