<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 519 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112264</link>
    <description>DTA clearances by a 100% EOU made under unrevised permissions of the Development Commissioner remain within the export policy entitlement unless excess clearance is established. Para 9.9(b) of the Export-Import Policy, 1997-2002 permits DTA sales up to 50% of FOB export value, subject to duty payment and NFEP conditions; Revenue cannot recalculate entitlement solely by restricting it to physical exports while valid permissions subsist. Reject sales are permitted based on unit records, with only quantities exceeding 5% of FOB export value counted against DTA entitlement. As no excess reject clearance was shown, the duty demand and penalties were unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:29:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 519 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112264</link>
      <description>DTA clearances by a 100% EOU made under unrevised permissions of the Development Commissioner remain within the export policy entitlement unless excess clearance is established. Para 9.9(b) of the Export-Import Policy, 1997-2002 permits DTA sales up to 50% of FOB export value, subject to duty payment and NFEP conditions; Revenue cannot recalculate entitlement solely by restricting it to physical exports while valid permissions subsist. Reject sales are permitted based on unit records, with only quantities exceeding 5% of FOB export value counted against DTA entitlement. As no excess reject clearance was shown, the duty demand and penalties were unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>