https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112263 An imported computer auto glare glass was treated as an accessory rather than a computer part or component because its function was only to reduce glare on a display screen and was not essential to computer operation. The article was described as a glass screen with a plastic edge, capable of use even on a television monitor, so Heading 8473 was held inapplicable. Following the Supreme Court approach on similar glass articles, the item was classified by its essential material character under Chapter 70 as an article of glass, and the Revenue's classification was accepted. en-us Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:26:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112263 An imported computer auto glare glass was treated as an accessory rather than a computer part or component because its function was only to reduce glare on a display screen and was not essential to computer operation. The article was described as a glass screen with a plastic edge, capable of use even on a television monitor, so Heading 8473 was held inapplicable. Following the Supreme Court approach on similar glass articles, the item was classified by its essential material character under Chapter 70 as an article of glass, and the Revenue's classification was accepted. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112263