https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112261 Revisional jurisdiction under the Code of Criminal Procedure is limited and cannot be used as a second appeal to re-appreciate evidence or upset concurrent findings unless illegality, perversity, or impropriety is shown; on that principle, the High Court's interference with the conviction was held unsustainable. Liability for house trespass and hurt with common intention was also sustained because common intention may be inferred from concerted conduct and the manner of assault, including joint entry and repeated beating. The conviction was restored, while the custodial sentence was modified by granting probation in view of the age of the incident and the neighbourhood dispute. en-us Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2017 15:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112261 Revisional jurisdiction under the Code of Criminal Procedure is limited and cannot be used as a second appeal to re-appreciate evidence or upset concurrent findings unless illegality, perversity, or impropriety is shown; on that principle, the High Court's interference with the conviction was held unsustainable. Liability for house trespass and hurt with common intention was also sustained because common intention may be inferred from concerted conduct and the manner of assault, including joint entry and repeated beating. The conviction was restored, while the custodial sentence was modified by granting probation in view of the age of the incident and the neighbourhood dispute. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112261