https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112251 The Tribunal addressed the appellant's request for an extension of stay and early listing of the appeal, citing coercion by the department to pay duty. Relying on the Tribunal's decision in IPCL v. CCE Vadodara, the Tribunal clarified that the stay of recovery would continue until the application for waiver of predeposit was disposed of, emphasizing the need for separate consideration of the stay issue. The Tribunal highlighted that the stay order did not automatically revive with the appeal, ensuring a stay of recovery until the application's resolution for justice. en-us Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:07:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112251 The Tribunal addressed the appellant's request for an extension of stay and early listing of the appeal, citing coercion by the department to pay duty. Relying on the Tribunal's decision in IPCL v. CCE Vadodara, the Tribunal clarified that the stay of recovery would continue until the application for waiver of predeposit was disposed of, emphasizing the need for separate consideration of the stay issue. The Tribunal highlighted that the stay order did not automatically revive with the appeal, ensuring a stay of recovery until the application's resolution for justice. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112251