https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112246 Retention of company accommodation after termination of service was treated as unauthorised where the right to occupy the quarter arose only as an incident of employment. The pendency of an industrial dispute challenging the termination did not preserve any continuing right to remain in occupation, because section 33(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act restrains alteration of service conditions during pending proceedings, not a termination already effected. In the absence of any stay of termination or other labour forum protection, prosecution under section 630 of the Companies Act was not barred for continued retention of the accommodation, and prior permission under section 33(1) was held inapplicable on these facts. en-us Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Dec 2014 20:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112246 Retention of company accommodation after termination of service was treated as unauthorised where the right to occupy the quarter arose only as an incident of employment. The pendency of an industrial dispute challenging the termination did not preserve any continuing right to remain in occupation, because section 33(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act restrains alteration of service conditions during pending proceedings, not a termination already effected. In the absence of any stay of termination or other labour forum protection, prosecution under section 630 of the Companies Act was not barred for continued retention of the accommodation, and prior permission under section 33(1) was held inapplicable on these facts. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112246