<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 424 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s application for a stay on the operation of the impugned order regarding the classification of Lal Tail under the Central Excise Tariff Act. The Tribunal noted that the impugned order was based on following Supreme Court judgments and directed the appeal for early hearing, setting a specific date for the hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 424 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s application for a stay on the operation of the impugned order regarding the classification of Lal Tail under the Central Excise Tariff Act. The Tribunal noted that the impugned order was based on following Supreme Court judgments and directed the appeal for early hearing, setting a specific date for the hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>