https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112223 Interim delivery of possession before trial was refused where a complaint under Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 involved contested issues of allotment, employment, termination, and the accused's duty to return company property. The court held that the special summary remedy under Section 630 does not justify bypassing adjudication on merits at the interlocutory stage. Powers under Section 452 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are exceptional and must be confined to post-inquiry or post-trial orders, so pre-trial restoration of possession would effectively grant final relief before determination of entitlement. Delay in the proceedings alone was not enough to warrant such relief. en-us Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Dec 2014 12:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112223 Interim delivery of possession before trial was refused where a complaint under Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 involved contested issues of allotment, employment, termination, and the accused's duty to return company property. The court held that the special summary remedy under Section 630 does not justify bypassing adjudication on merits at the interlocutory stage. Powers under Section 452 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are exceptional and must be confined to post-inquiry or post-trial orders, so pre-trial restoration of possession would effectively grant final relief before determination of entitlement. Delay in the proceedings alone was not enough to warrant such relief. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112223