<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 414 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112217</link>
    <description>Defective goods returned by customers for rectification are not to be valued as scrap under Rule 173L of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Tribunal noted that such returned final products have a higher value than scrap and, on the facts, a value also exceeding the duty originally paid, which undermined the Revenue&#039;s case for interim interference. Applying consistent prior decisions, it held that the refund orders could continue to operate and rejected the request for stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 414 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112217</link>
      <description>Defective goods returned by customers for rectification are not to be valued as scrap under Rule 173L of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Tribunal noted that such returned final products have a higher value than scrap and, on the facts, a value also exceeding the duty originally paid, which undermined the Revenue&#039;s case for interim interference. Applying consistent prior decisions, it held that the refund orders could continue to operate and rejected the request for stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>