<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 406 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to allow the adjustment of duty amount against the refund sanctioned to the Appellants under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal found that the demands were still outstanding at the time of the refund sanction and had not been set aside by a higher authority, justifying the adjustment. The Tribunal ruled that the refund was deemed provided to the extent of the adjustment and directed the Appellants to file fresh refund claims if any demands were subsequently set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:58:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 406 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to allow the adjustment of duty amount against the refund sanctioned to the Appellants under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal found that the demands were still outstanding at the time of the refund sanction and had not been set aside by a higher authority, justifying the adjustment. The Tribunal ruled that the refund was deemed provided to the extent of the adjustment and directed the Appellants to file fresh refund claims if any demands were subsequently set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>