<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 294 - HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112195</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the revision petition, upholding the mandatory nature of filing balance sheets and profit and loss accounts under Section 220(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioners&#039; failure to comply due to the non-appointment of a statutory auditor did not exempt them from this obligation. The court found no jurisdictional error in the magistrate&#039;s order and directed parties to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:48:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 294 - HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112195</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the revision petition, upholding the mandatory nature of filing balance sheets and profit and loss accounts under Section 220(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioners&#039; failure to comply due to the non-appointment of a statutory auditor did not exempt them from this obligation. The court found no jurisdictional error in the magistrate&#039;s order and directed parties to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>