<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 293 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112194</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation and demerger of two transferor companies with a transferee company, despite objections from the Central Government regarding the increase in authorized capital. The court dispensed with the need for meetings of equity shareholders, unsecured creditors, and secured creditors for all companies involved. Emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions and the bona fides of the scheme, the court clarified that no additional stamp duty or registration charges were required post-sanction. It directed the transferee company to adhere to Companies Act procedures, pay necessary stamp duty, and consider previously paid stamp duty, ensuring equity and good conscience in the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:46:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 293 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112194</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation and demerger of two transferor companies with a transferee company, despite objections from the Central Government regarding the increase in authorized capital. The court dispensed with the need for meetings of equity shareholders, unsecured creditors, and secured creditors for all companies involved. Emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions and the bona fides of the scheme, the court clarified that no additional stamp duty or registration charges were required post-sanction. It directed the transferee company to adhere to Companies Act procedures, pay necessary stamp duty, and consider previously paid stamp duty, ensuring equity and good conscience in the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>