<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 289 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112190</link>
    <description>The court found the petitioner-firm entitled to recover the outstanding principal amount from the respondent-company. The court determined interest at 12% per annum on the principal amount from April 1, 1998, to March 31, 2006, totaling Rs. 10,14,486.92. The court rejected the respondent&#039;s argument on the maintainability of the petition under sections 433 and 439, holding that the company judge has jurisdiction to determine the creditor&#039;s entitlement to interest. The petition succeeded, with the respondent ordered to pay the calculated interest within two months, failing which winding up proceedings would commence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:30:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 289 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112190</link>
      <description>The court found the petitioner-firm entitled to recover the outstanding principal amount from the respondent-company. The court determined interest at 12% per annum on the principal amount from April 1, 1998, to March 31, 2006, totaling Rs. 10,14,486.92. The court rejected the respondent&#039;s argument on the maintainability of the petition under sections 433 and 439, holding that the company judge has jurisdiction to determine the creditor&#039;s entitlement to interest. The petition succeeded, with the respondent ordered to pay the calculated interest within two months, failing which winding up proceedings would commence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>