<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 400 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112187</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order but reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 3 lakhs and penalties on the appellant-company and Director to Rs. 1 lakh and Rs. 50,000 respectively, citing the precedent in Asia Pacific Marbles P. Ltd. v. CC, Mumbai. The appellants, who had paid duty and demurrage charges, were granted the reduction, with any overpayment to be refunded within 3 months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:28:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 400 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112187</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order but reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 3 lakhs and penalties on the appellant-company and Director to Rs. 1 lakh and Rs. 50,000 respectively, citing the precedent in Asia Pacific Marbles P. Ltd. v. CC, Mumbai. The appellants, who had paid duty and demurrage charges, were granted the reduction, with any overpayment to be refunded within 3 months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>