<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 431 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112179</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of M/s. G.E. Plastics India Ltd. in an appeal against an Order-in-Appeal directing re-examination of settled issues by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai-I. The Tribunal held that the directive to re-examine old issues, including those already resolved in favor of the appellant, exceeded the permissible scope of the appeal. It emphasized that only issues raised in the appeal itself could be considered, setting aside the directive to re-examine settled matters. The decision aimed to uphold the finality of legal determinations and prevent unnecessary re-litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:55:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 431 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112179</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of M/s. G.E. Plastics India Ltd. in an appeal against an Order-in-Appeal directing re-examination of settled issues by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai-I. The Tribunal held that the directive to re-examine old issues, including those already resolved in favor of the appellant, exceeded the permissible scope of the appeal. It emphasized that only issues raised in the appeal itself could be considered, setting aside the directive to re-examine settled matters. The decision aimed to uphold the finality of legal determinations and prevent unnecessary re-litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>