https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112173 The court upheld the admission of a winding-up petition against the appellant company due to non-payment and quality dispute. The appellant's objections regarding the quality of goods supplied, a bona fide dispute over the amount due, and the claim being time-barred were dismissed for lack of evidence. The court emphasized the appellant's failure to substantiate their claims and noted the absence of a genuine dispute. The appellant's challenge was deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and continuation of interim stay for a specified period. en-us Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:44:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112173 The court upheld the admission of a winding-up petition against the appellant company due to non-payment and quality dispute. The appellant's objections regarding the quality of goods supplied, a bona fide dispute over the amount due, and the claim being time-barred were dismissed for lack of evidence. The court emphasized the appellant's failure to substantiate their claims and noted the absence of a genuine dispute. The appellant's challenge was deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and continuation of interim stay for a specified period. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112173