<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 338 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112167</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the official liquidator&#039;s application and discharged the receiver. Emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability, the court directed the official liquidator to explain the inclusion of certain sheds in the sale despite the valuer&#039;s report excluding them. The official liquidator was instructed to submit a detailed report within six weeks, addressing the discrepancies in the sale process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:34:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 338 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112167</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the official liquidator&#039;s application and discharged the receiver. Emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability, the court directed the official liquidator to explain the inclusion of certain sheds in the sale despite the valuer&#039;s report excluding them. The official liquidator was instructed to submit a detailed report within six weeks, addressing the discrepancies in the sale process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>