https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112166 The licensing regulations did not confer power to render a CHA licence inoperative merely because partners were disputing among themselves, and no breach of the licensing conditions or the Customs Act was shown; the inoperative direction was therefore set aside. At the same time, where the partnership deed required inter se disputes to be referred to arbitration and the pending requests for change in constitution depended on that dispute being resolved, the authority could direct the parties to pursue arbitration within a fixed time and then act on the pending applications if no settlement emerged. The decision thus distinguishes between the absence of jurisdiction to suspend the licence and the permissible direction to follow the agreed dispute-resolution mechanism. en-us Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:34:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112166 The licensing regulations did not confer power to render a CHA licence inoperative merely because partners were disputing among themselves, and no breach of the licensing conditions or the Customs Act was shown; the inoperative direction was therefore set aside. At the same time, where the partnership deed required inter se disputes to be referred to arbitration and the pending requests for change in constitution depended on that dispute being resolved, the authority could direct the parties to pursue arbitration within a fixed time and then act on the pending applications if no settlement emerged. The decision thus distinguishes between the absence of jurisdiction to suspend the licence and the permissible direction to follow the agreed dispute-resolution mechanism. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112166