https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112163 The Tribunal allowed the Respondent's application to accept 98 documents as evidence in the appeal. It rejected the objections raised by the appellants regarding the non-supply and belated production of documents. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of assessing the evidence for a fair decision and deemed the documents crucial for the appellants to counter the reliance on them. The Tribunal clarified the procedural rules allowing for additional evidence and noted that previous case law supported the acceptance of such applications. Consequently, all documents were admitted as evidence, and the appeal was scheduled for final hearing. en-us Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:26:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112163 The Tribunal allowed the Respondent's application to accept 98 documents as evidence in the appeal. It rejected the objections raised by the appellants regarding the non-supply and belated production of documents. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of assessing the evidence for a fair decision and deemed the documents crucial for the appellants to counter the reliance on them. The Tribunal clarified the procedural rules allowing for additional evidence and noted that previous case law supported the acceptance of such applications. Consequently, all documents were admitted as evidence, and the appeal was scheduled for final hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112163