https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112155 The petition was initially admitted for a specific sum with interest, and the company was allowed to contest the petition after applying to recall the order. The court acknowledged disputes over adjustments, authenticity of documents, and quality of goods, granting the company the luxury to contest the claim. The company was directed to pay the admitted amount within a specified timeframe and permitted to contest the claim while offering security. The balance claim of the petitioner was relegated to a separate suit, and a restraining order was granted to the petitioner for a limited period. en-us Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:08:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112155 The petition was initially admitted for a specific sum with interest, and the company was allowed to contest the petition after applying to recall the order. The court acknowledged disputes over adjustments, authenticity of documents, and quality of goods, granting the company the luxury to contest the claim. The company was directed to pay the admitted amount within a specified timeframe and permitted to contest the claim while offering security. The balance claim of the petitioner was relegated to a separate suit, and a restraining order was granted to the petitioner for a limited period. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112155