<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 627 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112116</link>
    <description>An appeal against a Company Law Board order refusing reference to arbitration under section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 lay to the appellate forum fixed by the Companies Act, not to the court of original territorial jurisdiction. Section 50 refers to the court authorised by law to hear appeals from such an order, so the proper forum was the High Court having jurisdiction over the company&#039;s registered office. The refusal to refer the dispute to arbitration was also supported by the nature of the company petition under sections 397 and 398 and the absence of a relevant arbitration agreement binding all necessary parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 627 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112116</link>
      <description>An appeal against a Company Law Board order refusing reference to arbitration under section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 lay to the appellate forum fixed by the Companies Act, not to the court of original territorial jurisdiction. Section 50 refers to the court authorised by law to hear appeals from such an order, so the proper forum was the High Court having jurisdiction over the company&#039;s registered office. The refusal to refer the dispute to arbitration was also supported by the nature of the company petition under sections 397 and 398 and the absence of a relevant arbitration agreement binding all necessary parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>