<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 418 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112112</link>
    <description>An intermediate transmission assembly arising during tractor manufacture is treated as excisable central excise goods if it has a distinct commercial identity and is capable of being bought and sold; actual open-market sale is not required. Where such captive production is not properly disclosed, the extended limitation period may be invoked for duty demand. Once duty is held payable, Modvat credit and revenue-neutral adjustment may remain relevant, but the exact set-off requires factual recomputation. Penalty on employee-officials is not sustainable where they are not the principal duty-bearing entity, while the company-level penalty question may remain open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:34:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 418 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112112</link>
      <description>An intermediate transmission assembly arising during tractor manufacture is treated as excisable central excise goods if it has a distinct commercial identity and is capable of being bought and sold; actual open-market sale is not required. Where such captive production is not properly disclosed, the extended limitation period may be invoked for duty demand. Once duty is held payable, Modvat credit and revenue-neutral adjustment may remain relevant, but the exact set-off requires factual recomputation. Penalty on employee-officials is not sustainable where they are not the principal duty-bearing entity, while the company-level penalty question may remain open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>