<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 621 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112096</link>
    <description>The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff for the principal amount and interest at 21% per annum. The plaintiff&#039;s request to withdraw the deposited amount was rejected, and the official liquidator was instructed to treat it as part of the defendant-company&#039;s assets for disbursement according to the Companies Act. The plaintiff&#039;s claim was treated as that of a secured creditor, ensuring equitable treatment among creditors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 621 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112096</link>
      <description>The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff for the principal amount and interest at 21% per annum. The plaintiff&#039;s request to withdraw the deposited amount was rejected, and the official liquidator was instructed to treat it as part of the defendant-company&#039;s assets for disbursement according to the Companies Act. The plaintiff&#039;s claim was treated as that of a secured creditor, ensuring equitable treatment among creditors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>