<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 412 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112090</link>
    <description>A joint show cause notice issued to two units was discussed as valid where the Department alleged that one unit was a dummy or fictitious concern of the other, and splitting the notice was not considered necessary. The text also notes that refusal to permit cross-examination of persons whose statements formed part of the evidentiary basis can raise a serious prima facie natural justice concern. On stay, the order considers documentary records, regular returns, audits, and inconsistencies in the demand and penalty findings, including the effect of registration cancellation, as supporting a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:25:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 412 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112090</link>
      <description>A joint show cause notice issued to two units was discussed as valid where the Department alleged that one unit was a dummy or fictitious concern of the other, and splitting the notice was not considered necessary. The text also notes that refusal to permit cross-examination of persons whose statements formed part of the evidentiary basis can raise a serious prima facie natural justice concern. On stay, the order considers documentary records, regular returns, audits, and inconsistencies in the demand and penalty findings, including the effect of registration cancellation, as supporting a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>